Every so often, the New York Post just can't help itself: they get obsessed with writing about us weird, kinky types. And predictably, they write about Dominant women doing something to submissive men because -- shock! horror! -- this is the most subversive thing they can think of.
There were two stories last week: here and here. Predictably, both are from male perspectives, two men who pursue Dominant women and are -- of course! -- married. One was that college professor who was nearly strangled to death by a pro-domme, and now of course everyone knows who he is, so he swears up and down that he's giving it up for good (yeah, right). The other is a UWS "professional" who conceals his desires from his wife and has a "relationship" with a Domme. I feel really bad for that Domme -- she's getting the short end of the stick, and if you happen upon this blog and read this, honey, let me tell you something: you really don't have to settle for some closeted married dude. There are plenty of single, submissive men, too. You have your choice of them, not the other way around. You should never take one who is anything less than what you want.
The writers of both articles -- Samuel Goldsmith and Joshua Rhett Miller -- seem absolutely unconcerned about including Female perspectives on this lifestyle in their articles, and almost exclusively quote men. This is completely typical of the Post -- they are usually creaming their pants to write smack-talk about Dommes, either professionals or not. Almost as if Sam and Josh have an axe to grind, you know? What happened, boys -- Mommy didn't spank you enough?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
i always thought that the New Yuck Post wasn't considered as a good reading anyway.
Dear Mistress Lola,
i miss Your writing.
Please forgive me for having in my last message on Collarme, played a poor victim.
You are a sweet ruler. And i misbehaved with my running fast imagination.
Your subject
Post a Comment